The following is a draft excerpt from my book, The Non-Toxic Avenger, that will be coming out in November 2011 from New Society Publishers:

Considering that one in four adults in the U.S. has at least one tattoo, many of them sporting quite a few, this is an issue that really needs more widespread education on the potential risks. I have two tattoos of small to medium size. Both are in areas that aren’t visible and I have no interest in getting them removed, although it would make sense since I am exposed to the metals from the pigments.
However, there are a few issues with laser tattoo removal. The first issue is that additional chemicals are used on the skin to reduce surface temperature so your skin doesn’t scar. The more commonly used chemical is tetrafluoroethane, which is a very toxic greenhouse gas. The alternative, which is considered to be more “green”, is a carbon dioxide spray, or rather, a dry ice spray, which is better for your skin and the ozone layer .
The big issue with laser tattoo removal is that, when you break down the pigments into small particles, the body has to do something with them. Research done at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) has been studying how tattoo ink breaks down in your body, either from exposure to sunlight or natural degradation, and the main question to be answered is, where does the pigment go? Are they broken down by enzymes or metabolized? At least in one study, researchers found that some pigment migrates from the tattoo site to the body’s lymph nodes . Considering that chemists at the NCTR identified low levels of carcinogens in tattoo ink, what kind of health impact is there in having a tattoo? And, if this is occurring under the normal lifetime of a tattoo, what happens when you try to remove it?
German scientists have shown that, after laser irradiation, the concentrations of toxic molecules from red and yellow tattoo inks increased up to 70-fold . Heat on the pigment triggers a chemical reaction that generates mutation-inducing and carcinogenic breakdown products that get reabsorbed by the body. At this point, it sounds more toxic to get them removed than to just leave them be.
One last point, too. The FDA warns that patients about to undergo an MRI let the technician know they have a tattoo, because it can swell or burn, most likely from the metals in the pigments. Something to keep in mind when I go visit the neurologist for that MRI for the numbness and tingling that I still have in my arms and legs.
7 comments:
That's interesting. Here I just thought they weren't all that appealing.
Congratulations on your new book. I'm sure it will be a huge success.
That makes me so glad I never got a tatoo!
Thanks for the info! Looking foward to your book! Congrats! I do have a number a tattoos and I'll remember this when I get my next MRI.
Vicki
Odd that I've never been asked about tattoos at any of my MIR's. I wonder why. I have two tattoos and have MS, so am often in the tube. Hmm.
Hmmmm, Might explain why my arm throbs every now and then right where my Tat is located.
Thank you for posting this. I had considered getting a tattoo. Not any more.
I had a swollen lymph node removed and it was black with tattoo ink - the surgeon at first assumed it was melanoma but the lab said it was pigment. I had the tattoo for 4 years prior. High deductible insurance, so it cost me $5K all told. And the node didn't actually have to come out. Regrets? I've had a few...
Post a Comment